29 April 2008

Assignment 4: WPI Publication


So, we had this assignment for my Rhetoric of Visual Design class. We had to revisit one of our older assignments, rewrite, rethink, reanalyze, and present it in some digitially-enhanced format, if possible. I figure I might as well do it here, since this is my own sort of diary, just an extremely public one (well, not too, public I guess -- no one comes here, ha!).

Here are excerpts from the paper, along with some visual graphics...

Worcester Polytechnic Institute publishes several hundred different documents throughout the year, with items ranging from forms, catalogs, manuals, and reference materials. However, one of the few documents published somewhat regularly is the school newspaper, The Towers.


All final decisions are made at about 4 am every Monday morning when the two editors-in-chief are c
ramming to get the edition laid out and completed. Time is a huge factor for this publication, as the staff only has one week in which to collect, edit, layout, and print contributions.


This newspaper relies heavily on graphics, which accompany ever article. The graphics do not stand alone in this type of publication, as Gunther Kress and Leeuwen would contend in their book, Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. However, the graphics aid The Towers which disagrees with Barthas concept of dependent- graphics. The graphics add to the overall content of the paper, making them an invaluable part of the paper’s innerworkings.

The way graphics operate in this paper may vary from other publications. A newspaper is informative in nature, and needs to provide clear interpretations of data. If the paper were to plop down graphics without explanations or introductions, news would not be transferable. While one reader may look at the front page and remember the hypnotist’s show fondly, another may believe that a terrible accident occurred. The graphics, therefore, cannot act independently in an informative publication.

When “reading” The Towers, my school's paper, one discovers new information from articles, titles, subtitles, cartoons, and, more importantly, graphics. Although many of the graphics could not stand alone without the text, the paper would not be able to stand without the graphics. The graphics convey a realism and accountability. Reading an article about a hypnotist’s show is one thing, seeing photos of people falling over, dancing, and stripping is an entirely different matter.

The photo speaks for the text. This is not always true. Photo's can be misleading, not honest. Neither Kress nor Barthos are correct or wrong. They only have a different purpose in mind for the graphic. A particular graphic is generally not better or worse when affected by text, but different. This is true of the hypnotist’s photo, which interpreted without text can be confusing, yet exciting; however when interpreted with text it is clear, but exact.


The difference lies in the purpose of the graphic, the purpose of the reader, and the goal of the publication.




Girelli, A. Rhetoric of Visual Design: Lecture. Conducted April 8, 2008. Salisbury Laboratories at Worcester Polytechnic Institute.

Texiara, Andrew. Interview on The Towers. Conducted April 8, 2008. Student Journalism Association Office.

The Towers. Volume 98, Issue 20. Student Journalism Association. April 8, 2008. Worcester Polytechnic Institute.

1 comment:

Lokabrenna said...

WHERE'S ASSIGNMENT 5???!!!

How often to you you check your blog?

"20080429"? How often do you post to your blog?

The writing is good. It is unfair, sad and true, but you have inherited the best non-genetic attributes of your parents: your mother's interest in music, theater and the arts, your father's interest in science and in words/writing. So what does that leave for your poor little sister? The soup at the bottom of the bowl, that's what! Poor thing.

Yes, that's right, someone else now wears the "poor thing" mantle, the proud badge of dishonor. In this Olympic year, it was time to pass the torch.

Meanwhile, Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull (shortened by us lazier folk to "the Crystal Skull") has been out for over a day. Seen it yet? Your Aunt Susan and I might be seeing it today. If we do, there's a pretty good chance your grandfather will be seeing it with us. Jealous yet? Aha! Good!

So...what else, what else, what else? Hmm, check the cell-phone...no messages. Put face close to window...sunny day, nice outside, but nothing earth-shaking going on. Switch on the TV...nope, nothing going on there. Check calendar...23rd of May, just another freaky Friday, probably nothing there either...

So-o-o-o, only thing I can come up with is that, by the iron-clad rules of logic, this is the 19th anniversary of May 23, 1989. Give me a sec here, still checking the date on Google. Ah, here it is: According to Celebrity Link: Birthdays, this is when Devin Douglas Drewitz was born! I just knew something important happened on that date!

Well, in that case there's only one thing left to say:

H A P P Y B I R T H D A Y ! ! !